Helpful Links
Constituent
Feedback

Tell me your thoughts!

Hot Topics

The Real Arena Costs
The current downtown area deal may very well end up costing the City...

Arena Debate
The exploration of building a new arena in Edmonton has been riddled with challenges...

Reflection on Arena Debate
The arena project was a prevalent topic in Edmonton during 2011...

Jasper Place Revitalization
Over five years ago, the City initiated a dialogue in the communities of West Jasper Place, Brittania Youngstown, Glenwood and Canora...

Wednesday
Feb082012

Unanimous Approval of TOD Guidelines

City's Approval of Transit Oriented Development Guidelines falls short in Protecting Communities.

This morning, the Executive Committee of Council gave unanimous approval to the Administration's draft guidelines for Transit Oriented Development. While the guidelines are exemplary in advancing and articulating the vision and values associated with densifying our city and expanding LRT, they are weak in their protection of community character and offer no firm enhancements or securities to communities.

A key shortcoming in the guidelines is as follows: Neighbourhoods as described in the Station Area Type Characteristics (page 11) make the assumption that all communities have predominately single family homes. This is clearly not the case. No references are made in the guidelines to the baseline densities and housing mix. If you fall within 400 meters of a station, the guidelines apply generically. There are no triggers or exemptions and no front end analysis of core service provision before stations and accompanying densities are approved. It may be elementary to note, but necessary to emphasize that the majority of Edmonton's mature neighbourhoods were built to accommodate predominately single family homes as 50 percent of the housing stock. What happens to core service costs and infrastructure if large multi-story developments suddenly appear in neighbourhoods with aging fire equipment and already stretched garbage collection and police response?

Intensifying is philosophically admirable, but it must be backed up with some reality. Densifying cannot be successful if it results in a further loss of green space, an erosion of core service provision or two few commercial and recreational amentiies to support the neighbourhoods population.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.